For emerging crypto exchanges, CexPass turns App Store rejection emails into reviewer-ready legal opinions, country scope memos, App Review Notes and appeal replies.
Your app facilitates cryptocurrency transactions, but you have not provided documentation of appropriate licensing in the countries or regions where your app is available…
Apple tells you which guideline was not satisfied. It rarely tells you which document would satisfy the reviewer. Repeated resubmissions only make the review history harder to clean up.
The team keeps changing UI, metadata and wording, while the review record gets messier. The real issue is often not code. It is that Apple cannot verify the compliance basis.
Entity, regions, licenses or exemptions, business scope and privacy data flows must map cleanly to the cited guideline and be written in App Review language.
CexPass does not pile up documents. We translate your exchange model, target markets and rejection history into a reviewer-readable evidence chain.
Decode the email, App Store Connect history and target markets to find the actual blocker.
Build submission-ready reasoning around the exchange entity, business model, target regions and access basis.
Clarify where the app can be distributed, where it should be restricted and how to explain each region.
Translate legal conclusions into concise reviewer language mapped to each cited guideline.
The real work is not quoting the guideline. It is knowing what evidence sits behind each rule and how to explain it to App Review.
A crypto exchange app must explain the entity, regions, permissions and available scope, or Apple may ask for documentation of appropriate licensing.
White-label templates, linked developer accounts or similar feature sets can be treated as duplicate apps.
Privacy labels, SDK behavior, ATT prompts and real data flows must match, or privacy tracking issues can trigger a new rejection.
Do not tick every storefront and hope. Define which markets can be served, how each one should be explained and which regions should be restricted.
This country matrix feeds the legal opinion, regional memo and App Review Notes, so the reviewer does not discover a new jurisdiction question mid-review.
We do not publish client names. We can still show the rejection pattern, the documents added and the path that moved the review forward.
No. We build jurisdiction-specific legal opinions and compliance access materials: proving the distribution structure for target markets, identifying available exemption paths and clarifying markets where authorization or restriction is required.
No. About 30 days is the average path across clients we have served. The actual timeline depends on the app, the rejection history and target markets. After a free diagnosis, we provide a day-by-day plan.
Three things: the original rejection email, current App Store Connect status and your target market list. That is usually enough to identify the blocker quickly.
Yes. Work is handled confidentially, and public examples are strictly redacted. You will not see client names on this page. That is intentional.
Send the rejection email. We will tell you what the real blocker is and which document should be added next. The first diagnosis is free.